Unrealistically expecting conclusive scientific proof of guilt before the factfinder will convict, resulting in acquittals of guilty defendants because of lack of forensic evidence.

Placing too much weight on forensic evidence produced by prosecution, resulting in convictions in cases where the defendant probably should have been acquitted.

Whereby parties levy attacks on authentic materials that a fact finder might accept.

An assertion that all evidence is potentially synthetic and must be interrogated.

The propensity for jurors/fact finders to place disproportionate weight on visual information, even if instructed that it may be fake.

The inexplicability of certain AI systems, frustrating the auditability of an AI-affected process.